Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro V5900

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +1250%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
May 2011
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
512
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Cayman
-
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy