Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 250W)
ATI FirePro V9800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +204%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Sep 2010
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Cypress
-
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
40 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy