Home GPU Comparison AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Ryzen Z1 Extreme GPU +554%
8.294 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2023
Release Date
Aug 2012
Console GPU(ASUS)
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
-
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
-
2700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
2GB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
16 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

86.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
129.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
16.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.294 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
518.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Phoenix
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
RDNA 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
4 nm
Process Size
28 nm
25.39 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
178 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy