Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA T1000 8 GB vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM T1000 8 GB and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T1000 8 GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T1000 8 GB
2.5 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +219%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2016
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
14
SM Count
-
896
Shading Units
4096
56
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

44.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
5.000 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
2.500 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
78.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Capsaicin
-
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Turing
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy