Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD FirePro W5000 DVI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 DVI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro W5000 DVI 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro W5000 DVI +15%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Feb 2013
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Pitcairn
-
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Turing
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy