Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

NVIDIA T400 4 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro SSG

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 260W)
AMD Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1500MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (483.8GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400 4 GB
1.094 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro SSG +1023%
12.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Aug 2017
Quadro
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
260W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL (215-0894124)
Turing
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
12 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy