Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA T400 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +378%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Mar 2014
Quadro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
6
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2816
24
TMUs
176
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Turing
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy