Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Lower TDP (30W vs 80W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1590MHz vs 1425MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
T400
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +160%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Jul 2020
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

420 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
896
24
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
80W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU117
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy