NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM T400 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA T400 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 204W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (159.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
T400
+54%
1.094 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
0.708 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2021
Release Date
Jan 2009
Quadro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
420 MHz
Base Clock
-
1425 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
6
SM Count
30
384
Shading Units
240
24
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
22.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
2.189 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1094 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
34.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
30W
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
TU117
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.3
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
