Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060 +528%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Oct 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
240
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
99.20 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

188W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G96
-
GPU Variant
NB9P-GLM
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy