Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla C1060 and 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C1060 's Advantages
Lower TDP (188W vs 295W)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C1060
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +9758%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2009
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
384
32
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

188W
TDP
295W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy