Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (238W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
19008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +15794%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
750W
550 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
MI300
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
146 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy