Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
5440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 238W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q +1292%
14.31 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
46
448
Shading Units
5888
56
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

238W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy