CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2050
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 and 16GB VRAM RTX A4500 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 144.0GB/s)
5440 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 238W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2050
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX A4500 Max Q
+1292%
14.31 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050
VS
RTX A4500 Max Q
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
510 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
750 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
46
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
5888
56
TMUs
184
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
184
-
RT Cores
46
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.6 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
223.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.31 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.31 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.6 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF100
GPU Name
GA104
GF100-850-A3
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Board Design
238W
TDP
80W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla M1060
2
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI100
3
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q
4
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max Q
5
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
6
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
7
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy