CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
VS
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
5696 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 247W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
+1764%
19.17 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
VS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
783 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
160bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s
Render Config
14
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
448
Shading Units
6144
56
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
AD104
GF110-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Board Design
247W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GRID K500 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
2
NVIDIA Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
3
NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
4
AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
5
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
6
NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
7
NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin 32 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
8
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600
9
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
10
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
Related News
1
AMD's Latest Breakthrough Technology Could Change the Game in the Future
2
Researchers Utilize NVIDIA Omniverse Platform to Analyze and Improve 3D Stacked Chip Designs
3
TSMC to Receive Over 60 EUV Lithography Machines Over the Next Two Years, Investing More Than $12.3 Billion
4
Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time
5
AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied
6
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
7
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
8
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
9
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
10
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy