Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA GRID K160Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Lower TDP (130W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +308%
1.332 TFLOPS
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2013
Tesla
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
130W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy