NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
+81%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
51W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
