Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090 +76%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2012
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
576
64
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy