NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
1024 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (122W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 SYNC
+62%
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2013
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
122W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
2.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
