NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 16GB VRAM RTX A5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1500MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
6912 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 Mobile
+1571%
22.27 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Mar 2022
Tesla
Generation
Ampere-MW
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
975 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
58
512
Shading Units
7424
64
TMUs
232
48
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
232
-
RT Cores
58
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.27 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.27 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GA103
-
-
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3 billion
Transistors
22 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
496 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
