NVIDIA Tesla C2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+219%
4.252 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
512
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF110
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
