CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon PRO W7900
VS
NVIDIA Tesla K20c
AMD Radeon PRO W7900
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c and 48GB VRAM Radeon PRO W7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 295W)
AMD Radeon PRO W7900 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 5GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 208.0GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Tesla K20c
3.524 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W7900
+1640%
61.32 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c
VS
Radeon PRO W7900
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Apr 2023
Tesla
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
5GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
320bit
Memory Bus
384bit
208.0GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
96
2496
Shading Units
6144
208
TMUs
384
40
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
96
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
1280 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
Theoretical Performance
36.71 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
146.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
3.524 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
1175 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110
GPU Name
Navi 31
GK110-885-KA-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Kepler
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Board Design
225W
TDP
295W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16
2
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA GRID K220Q
3
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla K40st
4
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI300
5
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075
6
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS 16 GB
7
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
8
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
9
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
10
NVIDIA Tesla K20c vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Related News
1
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
2
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
3
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
4
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
5
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
6
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
7
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
8
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
9
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
10
AMD's Commitment to Pioneering Each Generation with Cutting-Edge Process Technology and Continuous Innovation in Design, Packaging, and Assembly
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy