Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (876MHz vs 784MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (108W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40c +139%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
1344
240
TMUs
112
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
108W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK180
GPU Name
GK104
GK180-890-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.5
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy