Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K40c and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla K40c 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1163MHz vs 876MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 245W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K40c +182%
5.046 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

745 MHz
Base Clock
796 MHz
876 MHz
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
768
240
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

245W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK180
GPU Name
GM206
GK180-890-A1
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.5
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy