Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

NVIDIA Tesla K80 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 12GB VRAM Tesla K80 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 120% (1815MHz vs 824MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 12GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 240.6GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (230W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla K80
4.113 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 +171%
11.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2014
Release Date
Aug 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
824 MHz
Boost Clock
1815 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.6GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
2496
Shading Units
3072
208
TMUs
192
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

42.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
116.2 GPixel/s
171.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
348.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.30 TFLOPS
4.113 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.15 TFLOPS
1371 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
348.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

300W
TDP
230W
700 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK210
GPU Name
TU104
GK210-885-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-875-A1
Kepler 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
7.1 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.7
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy