Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Tesla M1060 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Tesla M1060 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M1060 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
208 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 188W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M1060 +828%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
4
240
Shading Units
32
80
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

188W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy