Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
6464 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050
1.03 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +1792%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jun 2021
Tesla
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
80GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
108
448
Shading Units
6912
56
TMUs
432
48
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
300W
550 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GA100
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy