Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2050 +4378%
1.03 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-I

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
1
448
Shading Units
8
56
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.10 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.320 GPixel/s
32.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1030 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.20 GFLOPS
515.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
12W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GS
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy