Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2075 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2075 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (78W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2075 +267%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Jan 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
783 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
150.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
448
Shading Units
112
56
TMUs
56
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

225W
TDP
78W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G92
GF110-876-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy