Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090 +732%
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Feb 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
924 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
64
64
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
70W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy