Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +297%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
May 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
80W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
3 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy