Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +34%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
48
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy