Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 500M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +5152%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro 500M
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2011
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
96
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
4
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
N12M-Q3
Volta
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy