Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +3248%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
16
5120
Shading Units
128
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
100W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy