NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

VS

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages

Released 11 years and 2 months late

Boost Clock1380MHz

More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)

5088 additional rendering cores

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages

Lower TDP (42W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Tesla PG500 216 +20989%

14.13 TFLOPS

Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

0.067 TFLOPS

Tesla PG500 216

VS

Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Graphics Card

Nov 2019

Release Date

Sep 2008

Tesla

Generation

Quadro FX

Professional

Type

Professional

PCIe 3.0 x16

Bus Interface

PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz

Base Clock

-

1380 MHz

Boost Clock

-

1106 MHz

Memory Clock

650 MHz

Memory

32GB

Memory Size

512MB

HBM2

Memory Type

GDDR3

4096bit

Memory Bus

128bit

1133GB/s

Bandwidth

20.80GB/s

Render Config

-

80

SM Count

4

5120

Shading Units

32

320

TMUs

16

128

ROPs

8

640

Tensor Cores

-

128 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

-

6 MB

L2 Cache

32 KB

-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

4.160 GPixel/s

441.6 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

8.320 GTexel/s

28.26 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

-

14.13 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

66.56 GFLOPS

7.066 TFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Board Design

250W

TDP

42W

600 W

Suggested PSU

200 W

No outputs

Outputs

2x DVI 1x S-Video

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GV100

GPU Name

G84

-

Volta

Architecture

Tesla

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

12 nm

Process Size

80 nm

21.1 billion

Transistors

0.289 billion

815 mm²

Die Size

169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

11.1 (10_0)

4.6

OpenGL

3.3

3.0

OpenCL

1.1

1.3

Vulkan

N/A

7.0

CUDA

1.1

6.6

Shader Model

4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800

2

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

3

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

4

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

5

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

6

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs Intel Data Center GPU Max Subsystem

7

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

8

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

9

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP

10

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

Related News

1

Double the Excitement! AMD FSR 4.0 to Launch Alongside RX 9070 XT Graphics Card

2

CPU-Z Minor Update: Support for Intel's Four New Products and New Memory

3

CXMT Reportedly Achieves 80% Yield in DDR5 Production

4

Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N

5

The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market

6

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

7

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

8

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

9

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

10

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption