Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 224.0GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1627MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (60W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +112%
14.13 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
6.664 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jan 2022
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

80
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
5120
Shading Units
2048
320
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
48
640
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GA107S
-
GPU Variant
-
Volta
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
12 nm
Process Size
8 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
Unknown
815 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

250W
TDP
60W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
8.6
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy