Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 8GB VRAM Quadro M4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro M4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +449%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro M4000
2.573 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2015
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
1664
320
TMUs
104
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
49.47 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.39 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.573 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
80.39 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
120W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GM204
-
GPU Variant
GM204-850-A1
Volta
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
5.2
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy