Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
5088 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +18994%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 320M
0.074 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Jun 2007
Tesla
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
4
5120
Shading Units
32
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy