Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1543MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +155%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
6GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR5
4096bit
Memory Bus
192bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
14
5120
Shading Units
1792
320
TMUs
112
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
6.1
6.6
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy