Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (32GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 416.0GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1545MHz vs 1380MHz)
Lower TDP (160W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG500 216 +98%
14.13 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Nov 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1260 MHz
Base Clock
1005 MHz
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
36
5120
Shading Units
2304
320
TMUs
144
128
ROPs
64
640
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

176.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
441.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
28.26 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
14.13 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
7.066 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
160W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
TU104
-
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Volta
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.0
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy