Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 37% (2100MHz vs 1530MHz)
More VRAM (128GB vs 32GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 1133GB/s)
9472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216
15.67 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +682%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128GB
HBM2
Memory Type
HBM3
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
80
SM Count
-
5120
Shading Units
14592
320
TMUs
880
128
ROPs
0
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
6 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
760W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
5 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
146 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy