Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 vs NVIDIA Quadro 600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 32GB VRAM Tesla PG503 216 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla PG503 216 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
5024 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla PG503 216 +6269%
15.67 TFLOPS
Quadro 600
0.246 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2019
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1312 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1106 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1133GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
80
SM Count
2
5120
Shading Units
96
320
TMUs
16
128
ROPs
8
640
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

195.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.560 GPixel/s
489.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.24 GTexel/s
31.33 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
15.67 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
245.8 GFLOPS
7.834 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
20.48 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
40W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GV100
GPU Name
GF108
-
-
-
Volta
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.1 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
815 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.0
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy