Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla S1070 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla S1070
VS
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla S1070
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1070 and 24GB VRAM Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1455MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
4368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1070
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile +2055%
13.41 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Sep 2019
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Turing-M
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1275 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
672.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
72
240
Shading Units
4608
80
TMUs
288
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
72
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.7 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
419.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.82 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.41 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
419.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
Unknown
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy