Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (108W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075 +34%
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2009
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
24
240
Shading Units
192
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
108W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy