Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1552 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile +789%
5.53 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1328 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
14
240
Shading Units
1792
80
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

800W
TDP
75W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy