Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
5904 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +2981%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Mar 2023
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
160bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
48
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
AD104
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
70W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy