Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

NVIDIA Tesla S1075 vs NVIDIA Tesla X2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 and 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
272 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
Tesla X2090 +114%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Tesla
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
240
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

800W
TDP
225W
1200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy