Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Tesla S2050
VS
AMD Instinct MI300X
NVIDIA Tesla S2050
AMD Instinct MI300X
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 148.4GB/s)
19008 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (750W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050
1.028 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +15794%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2023
Tesla
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
773 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
14
SM Count
-
448
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
880
48
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

900W
TDP
750W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
MI300
-
-
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
146 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy