Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +114%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Dec 2010
Tesla
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
448
Shading Units
192
56
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS

Board Design

900W
TDP
62W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Fermi
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy