Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 3GB VRAM Tesla S2050 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 4700 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla S2050 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (226W vs 900W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla S2050 +167%
1.028 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4700 X2
0.384 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Apr 2008
Tesla
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
773 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
148.4GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
16
448
Shading Units
128
56
TMUs
64
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.07 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
32.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1028 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
513.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

900W
TDP
226W
1300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF100
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
G92-880-A2
Fermi
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.1 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
529 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy