Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Tesla X2090 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Tesla X2090 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Tesla X2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +848%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2011
Release Date
Oct 2016
Tesla
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
924 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
177.4GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
30
512
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
48
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

20.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
41.66 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
1332 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
666.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GF110
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy